Thursday, October 22, 2009

Are Morals Absolute?

Why morals must be absolute
A Socratic Dialogue
By Dr. Norman R. Wise
Sam: Socrates is morality absolute or relative?
Socrates: What do you mean by absolute?
Sam: The same at all times and in all places?
Socrates: What do you mean by relative?
Sam: That is obvious, that things are different at different times and in different places?
Socrates: It is obvious but I like to be careful. One can never be too careful when talking about important issues. Speed kills good thought.
Sam: I know but I become impatient.
Socrates: Well then we should proceed since I am sure you do not want to hear my lecture on patience.
Sam: True, so where were we?
Socrates: We had determined that morality is absolute if it is the same at all times and in all places and morality would be relative if is different at different times and in different places. Would you say that is a fair summary?
Sam: Yes, that would seem to be what we are attempting to determine. Which do you think is true?
Socrates: What do we mean by morality?
Sam: Living in the right way. Making my behavior be good instead of evil.
Socrates: So you are suggesting there is a right way to live and a wrong way to live? The right way to live is the moral lifestyle and the wrong way to live is the immoral lifestyle. Is this what you are saying?
Sam: Yes, that would be seem to be the heart of it.
Socrates: So the question is if there is always one “right lifestyle” to have at all times and in all places or if the” right lifestyle” is different at different times and in different places. Is that what we are asking?
Sam: Well and maybe if there really is even a “right lifestyle” at all? Who is to say that there is one lifestyle more right than another lifestyle?
Socrates: So this question would be if there really is any morality at all. Is morality an illusion since there is no distinction between a right or wrong manner of life?
Sam: Yes, is morality just a social invention made up by communities in order to reach some goals?
Socrates: That would perhaps really be ethics and not morality but your point is taken.
Sam: What do you mean?
Socrates: Well I think it is best to distinguish between morality which attempts to define what is the nature of the “right life” or “virtuous life” and ethics which then attempts to take the agreed upon standards of morality and apply them into taboos and laws for society. Ethics would be one part of applied morality. If morality is an illusion then ethics would have rational basis.
Sam: So is morality an illusion?
Socrates: Is reality an illusion?
Sam: No reality is the opposite of an illusion. What “IS” is real and what “is not” is an illusion.
Socrates: I would agree. Reality is absolute and not relative. That which “IS” is reality. The fundamental essence of what actually exists does not change from place to place.
Sam: So what does this have to do with morality?
Socrates: Is there a right way to think about things and a wrong way to think about something? Can one think correctly about mathematics and is it possible to think incorrectly about mathematics?
Sam: Yes, that is obvious. One can think that 2+2=4 or one can think that 2+2=5; but reality is that 2+2=4. So yes, one can think correctly about math or one can think incorrectly about math.
Socrates: So, on is “living right” when one gets the right answer to the math question and one is failing to “live right” when one gets a wrong answer to the math question.
Sam: This is thinking not living?
Socrates: Is thinking not part of life?
Sam: Yes, that is true. But morality has to do with doing not thinking?
Socrates: Do people normally base their actions upon their thinking?
Sam: Yes, most of time we think and then act. However sometimes we simply act emotionally.
Socrates: So thinking can be and many times is an important part of us taking actions?
Sam: Yes, so then thinking has to be part of morality since it is on the basis of thinking we live. Thinking correctly would lead to living correctly.
Socrates: So it would appear. So perhaps what we should define morality as is the way we would logically act based upon a proper understanding of what reality truly “IS”.
Sam: Wait a minute. You are suggesting then that the “right way to live” is simply to logically adapt our lives, thoughts, words, emotions, and actions to the actual state of existence. Our morals should just be the reasonable expression of nature of being, existence or reality.
Socrates: Yes, that would seem to be the case. Morality is a dependent on what “IS”. If God exists then part of a rational lifestyle would b to worship this deity while if God does not exist then it would be absurd and irrational to worship, a waste of valuable time and energy. If there is no God then worship is immoral. If God does exist then worship is moral. It all depends on what “IS”.
Sam: But people do not agree to what reality “IS”, so how can we determine what is moral?
Socrates: There will be disagreement on morals whenever there is disagreement about the nature of reality.
Sam: So morals are relative to what one believes about the nature of reality?
Socrates: Yes, each person will believe that the right way to live is that which best lines up with what they really believe is the state of reality. Now there can be other emotional or social factors that impact our actions. But even these can be broken down and made part of the equation which would logically and rationally explain our actions. Only the actions of insane people are without explanation since they live in a world of illusion and have no touch with reality.
Sam: So to be absolutely sure of the right way to live would require one to absolutely sure about the nature of reality. Is this what you are saying?
Socrates: Yes, and to have logically and consistently thought thru properly the best way to apply that into our daily thoughts, words, emotions, and actions. To be sane is to know and accept reality as it is and then to live in the light of what actually exists free of all illusions. To live sanely is to live a moral life. To the degree I believe in illusion I am to that degree insane and to the degree I believe in things as they truly are, then I am sane.
Sam: But does any human being completely know what is real?
Socrates: No, we are limited. We can know in part what truly is and yet still be ignorant or believe in illusions about other aspects of reality.
Sam: So our ability to “live right” is relative to our thinking right about the nature of how the universe really “IS”. The more we think right about what “IS” then the better we could know how to live.
Socrates: Yes, and in the area of morality the key question is also making a decision to “do” what is sane over that which is insane. Sometimes, doing the right thing will be more difficult than living in an illusion. I might know that drugs keep me from knowing reality and therefore make me less sane but I might decide that I would feel better out of touch with reality so I choose to act immorally and put myself into an illusion. To choose to face reality requires courage since it may not always reflect what we want.
Sam: So can anyone know absolutely how to live right?
Socrates: Only a being who knew the absolute state of reality, who was flawless in logic, and willing to define the “right way” to live in light of that reality regardless of the consequences could know morality absolutely.
Sam: That sounds like a description of God.
Socrates: Yes, since God knows reality with complete knowledge, and is perfect in logic then God would be able to define what is the sane life, for other beings, less knowledgeable about the nature of reality. This is why people turn to revelations from God to help them to define morals. The LOGOS would have a perfect understanding of morality.
Sam: So, is morality absolute or relative
Socrates: In reality it is absolute. Our understanding of morality is relative to our comprehension of reality. We believe one way of life is better than another based upon our beliefs about the nature of what actually exists. If one feels they can know nothing about the ultimate nature of reality then they would feel agnostic about morals as well. Our understanding of morals is limited to our understanding of what ultimately “IS”. However, since morality is an defining of how we ought to live in the light of reality it is as absolute as reality “IS”.

Monday, October 12, 2009

Not Judging the Heart

1Ki 8:39 then hear in heaven your dwelling place and forgive and act and render to each whose heart you know, according to all his ways (for you, you only, know the hearts of all the children of mankind),
2Ch 6:30 then hear from heaven your dwelling place and forgive and render to each whose heart you know, according to all his ways, for you, you only, know the hearts of the children of mankind,
Jer 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it? "I the LORD search the heart and test the mind, to give every man according to his ways, according to the fruit of his deeds."
Mat 7:1-5 "Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you. Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when there is the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye.
Act 1:24 And they prayed and said, "You, Lord, who know the hearts of all, show which one of these two you have chosen
1Co 2:11 For who knows a person's thoughts except the spirit of that person, which is in him? So also no one comprehends the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God.
1Co 4:5 Therefore do not pronounce judgment before the time, before the Lord comes, who will bring to light the things now hidden in darkness and will disclose the purposes of the heart. Then each one will receive his commendation from God.
Eph 4:29-32 Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear. And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption. Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice. Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.
Jas 4:11 Do not speak evil against one another, brothers. The one who speaks against a brother or judges his brother, speaks evil against the law and judges the law. But if you judge the law, you are not a doer of the law but a judge. There is only one lawgiver and judge, he who is able to save and to destroy. But who are you to judge your neighbor?
1Pe 2:17 Honor everyone. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the emperor.



God alone knows the hearts of human beings. Because our hearts are deceitful our own self knowledge may be imperfect. Next to God, each of us has the greatest ability to know our own hearts and what motivates us in our words and actions. It is impossible however for anyone else to know what the thoughts and intentions of the heart of another person are unless they are self pronounced. When we judge the motives of people we take the place of God.
People are made in the image of God and therefore have dignity and deserve respect (1 Peter 2:17). Those in authority have been put in that position of authority by God and therefore deserve honor for being the one chosen by God to hold that position (Romans 13:1-5). We are to love other people even our enemies (Matthew 5:44). Part of loving another person is not to judge their motives but to give them the judgment of charity which is that we should believe the best motives for whatever they have done.
We live in a time when we do not know how to honor other people. We are not well trained in showing honor to authorities. We do not know how to disagree in an agreeable manner. We find it hard to season every word with grace, mercy, longsuffering, and patience. It is easy for our words to do great harm (James 3).
There is also the need of humility. We do need to judge ourselves and our own motives. We need to think more highly of others then we think of ourselves (Phil 2:3). We should be able to admit our own need to change and improve. We may even come to believe that others have something positive to teach us. It is possible that in the dialogue of ideas that we may actually grow if we do not assume we have all the answers before we begin.
We live in very polarized times. We see those who disagree with us as being “worthless” and “empty headed”, not recognizing that such judgments make us guilty of the sin of murder (Matthew 522). It is one thing to say we disagree with what a person says or does. We can and should judge an idea or action as wrong. But it is entirely different to curse one who is made is the image of God and fail to give them the respect and honor due them from God. When we do this we open up a dark door of vengeance and self righteousness which normally only leads to a growing escalation of abuse and eventually violence.
So let each of us each evaluate what we say and do in judging the motives of others. Let us strive to be peace makers in a world who has lost its taste for peace. Let us guard against gossip and speech which is cynical and belittling. Let us pray for those we disagree with and treat them with the respect that God has ordained we give to them. Then we will be salt and light in the world and a source of healing.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

In the Sea

The order tells us the reason lives.

The disorder darkens the light and steals from us our hope in sanity

Light and darkness both speak to us

They sing to us

One begging us to believe

The other one to despair

Why did paradise have to be lost?

That is the question that troubles us.

We still know that paradise is suppose to be our homes

Thursday, October 08, 2009

Seek Justice

Amos 5:6-7, 10-15
6 Seek the Lord and live, or he will break out against the house of Joseph like fire, and it will devour Bethel, with no one to quench it. 7 Ah, you that turn justice to wormwood, and bring righteousness to the ground!
10 They hate the one who reproves in the gate, and they abhor the one who speaks the truth. 11 Therefore because you trample on the poor and take from them levies of grain, you have built houses of hewn stone, but you shall not live in them; you have planted pleasant vineyards, but you shall not drink their wine. 12 For I know how many are your transgressions, and how great are your sins— you who afflict the righteous, who take a bribe, and push aside the needy in the gate. 13 Therefore the prudent will keep silent in such a time; for it is an evil time. 14 Seek good and not evil, that you may live; and so the Lord, the God of hosts, will be with you, just as you have said. 15 Hate evil and love good, and establish justice in the gate; it may be that the Lord, the God of hosts, will be gracious to the remnant of Joseph.
Literal - This chapter is part of a “funeral Dirge” a song of lament for the nation of Israel (Amos 5:1-2). This is a strong statement because the nation has not actually “died “yet. This piece of “prophetic drama” was purposely done to awaken the nation to its serious spiritual plight even as it enjoyed political and economic prosperity.
Amos was a contemporary of Isaiah, Micah, Jonah and Hosea. Under Jeroboam II (around 781 B.C.) the kingdom of Israel reached the zenith of its prosperity. The gap between rich and poor widened at this time and the rich were becoming richer by oppressing the poor, taking their land, and bribing the judicial system. Amos was called by God from his rural home in the Southern Kingdom to remind the rich and powerful of God's requirement for social and political justice (2:6-16). He claimed that religion that is not accompanied by right action is cursed by God (5:21ff.), and prophesied that the kingdom of Israel would be destroyed which occurred about sixty years after these prophecies were given (e.g. 5:1-2; 8:2).
Amos instead of saying “God bless Israel” actually said “God damn Israel unless she repent”. Perhaps Amos is called because Jonah has a hard time warning Israel of God’s condemnation due to her sins because of his love of Israel as a nation which leads to his desire to see her enemies destroyed even when God may have a redemptive plan.
This “funeral Dirge” was done at one of the centers of worship in Israel located at Bethel. It was the place where the king loved to worship and thank God for all the prosperity that had come upon the nations. It was where the state paid prophets would declare how God would prosper Israel and defeat her enemies. In the midst of this optimistic and positive environment comes Amos singing a song of death and mourning over a nation that has died, but simply does not know it yet.
Amos says that Israel must repent or die. They have turned “justice” into poison. Justice is to be the source of nourishment and life to a society. But here it has been turned into wormwood a bitter poison that only brings sickness and health. Righteousness has been knocked down and pushed out of the way. All of this has happened in the gate of the city where people where people were to go to find justice.
The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was very concerned in what happened "in the gate" because it was the primary public arena for finding fairness, compassion, and social order in accord with the principles, personality and history of Yahweh and Yahweh’s people. The book of Moses reminded Israel that God "takes no bribe," "executes justice for the orphan and the widow," and "loves the strangers." Israel was to be a reflection of God's justice in its own life and social relationships (Deuteronomy 10:17-18). Their failure to do this was now bringing God’s judgment upon them.
The key problem here is that the poor have not been given equal justice. Their rights have not been upheld in the public square. The rich have been able to win in court and avoid punishment for their crimes while the poor have not been given fair trials. The rich have been able to manipulate the system to keep the poor from keeping their land and the truly impoverished have not been cared for with compassion. God is condemning Israel for her lack of social and political justice. The eternal creator of the universe cares that we demonstrate love for our neighbor by the establishment of a just social system. Failure to do this will bring about the end of that society and divine judgment upon them.
For believers our concern must be to know and define the nature of social and political justice. God is for justice. We are to be for justice. What is justice? What does it mean to have a just society? What actions in a society are seen as unjust and a failure to love our neighbor? How can the poor be oppressed by the rich in our society? How could the poor be protected? These are critical concerns for God. They need to also be critical concerns for us.
Christological: One of our hopes to see Christ return is that with that return perfect justice will reign over all the earth. Jesus the Messiah will bring an end to all oppression and unjust rule. He will establish perfect fairness in the governing of the earth.
Moral: We should hunger and thirst after righteousness and social justice. It should be a deep desire and need in our lives to see this fulfilled in our lives and our community.
Eternal: Rev 21:3-4 And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, "Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away."
Prayer: Help me to hate evil and love good. Grant me a heart and mind that understands and desires justice for the weak, poor, and oppressed.
Contemplation: Seek justice and love righteousness
Action: List areas of injustice in our community. What could you do to help restore justice? What are you doing that encourages injustice? What would Amos say to us today? How should you and I change?